How You Can Help End Polarization and Inequality – and Get Happier, Too | Robert Putnam & Shaylyn Romney Garrett

Dec 15, 2021 Episode Page ↗
Overview

Robert Putnam (Harvard) and Shaylyn Romney Garrett discuss their book, 'The Upswing,' analyzing America's historical I-we-I curve of individualism to communalism and back. They offer insights on how individuals can contribute to a new, more inclusive upswing today.

At a Glance
17 Insights
52m 5s Duration
17 Topics
8 Concepts

Deep Dive Analysis

Introduction to America's Current Social Challenges

Introducing the I-We-I Curve: A Historical Overview

Measuring Social Dynamics: Data Behind the I-We-I Curve

The Upswing: America's Shift from Gilded Age to Progressive Era

The Role of Moral and Cultural Shifts in the Upswing

The Social Gospel Movement and Moral Reawakening

Young Reformers and the Rise of Community Building

The Rotary Club: An Example of Association Building

Bottom-Up Movements and Laboratories of Democracy

The High School Movement: A Bottom-Up Innovation

Cautionary Tales: The Exclusionary Nature of the Progressive 'We'

The Downswing: How the 'We' Turned Back to 'I' in the 1960s

Racial Backlash and the Zero-Sum Game Mentality

Rebalancing Individualism and Collective Responsibility

Practical 'Heart Work' for Individuals Today

The Importance of Local Action and Youth Leadership

Spirituality: I-Focused vs. We-Focused Approaches

I-We-I Curve

A statistical curve illustrating how American society has evolved over 125 years, measuring political polarization, economic inequality, social isolation, and self-centeredness. It shows a period of individualism (I) in the Gilded Age, a shift towards collectivism (We) during the Progressive Era, and a return to individualism (I) from the mid-1960s to the present.

Gilded Age

An era in the late 1800s characterized by deep polarization, significant economic inequality, social isolation, and extreme cultural narcissism. This period is noted for its striking resemblance to the social dynamics of today.

Progressive Era (Capital-P)

A diverse, bipartisan movement emerging around 1900, driven by a desire to reverse the nation's downward drift and a belief in the power of ordinary citizens to create change. It led to a multi-decade upswing in social connection and equality, though it had significant exclusionary aspects regarding race.

Social Darwinism

A mistaken application of Darwin's theory of evolution to society, suggesting that if everyone looks out for themselves ('survival of the fittest'), society will naturally improve. This theory promoted self-interest and a 'devil take the hindmost' mentality.

Social Gospel Movement

A moral reawakening, primarily among evangelical Protestants, that challenged Social Darwinism. It emphasized moral obligations to others, particularly 'the least of us,' and advocated for shaping society through democratic mechanisms rather than solely focusing on individual salvation.

Social Capital

The value that relationships bring to society. Progressive reformers built vast new stores of social capital by creating associations and new ways of bringing people together, particularly amongst unlike groups, to foster connection and citizen-driven change.

Laboratories of Democracy

A concept originating from the Progressive Era, referring to the idea that social change and innovation begin at the local level (neighborhoods, cities, states). People try out many different ideas in their communities, some of which prove successful and spread.

Self-Interest Rightly Understood

A concept, attributed to Alexis de Tocqueville, that suggests true self-interest involves thinking long-term about how investing in what is collectively good for all ultimately benefits the individual. It contrasts with short-sighted individualism that sees society as a zero-sum game.

?
What is the I-We-I curve and what does it represent?

The I-We-I curve is a statistical representation of American society's changes over the last 125 years, tracking political polarization, economic inequality, social isolation, and self-centeredness. It shows a historical pattern of shifting from an 'I' (individualistic) period to a 'We' (communal) period, and then back to 'I'.

?
How is the I-We-I curve measured?

The I-We-I curve is a compendium curve that braids together scores of different data sets across four lenses: economics, politics, society, and culture. For example, polarization is measured by congressional bipartisanship, affective polarization among citizens, and split-ticket voting rates.

?
What initiated the 'upswing' from the Gilded Age to the Progressive Era?

The upswing began with a cultural or moral shift, specifically the replacement of Social Darwinism with the Social Gospel movement. This moral reawakening led Americans to reconsider their obligations to one another, fostering a sense of collective responsibility that preceded economic and political changes.

?
Who were the key drivers of the Progressive Era upswing?

The upswing was largely driven by young reformers, many aged 30 or younger, who were responding to the loneliness and hyper-individualism of industrialized cities. They focused on creating new associations and community-building initiatives from the bottom up.

?
What was a significant flaw in the Progressive Era's 'We' movement?

The 'we' built during the Progressive Era was not inclusive; many progressives were racist, and the movement often sacrificed the needs of people of color for broader progress. This meant that structural inequality, particularly racial, was baked into many innovations and programs, carrying the seeds of the upswing's eventual demise.

?
What contributed to the 'downswing' in American society starting in the 1960s?

The downswing was significantly influenced by a white backlash to the civil rights movement, where support for legislation quickly turned into resistance against its implementation. This re-triggered a 'zero-sum game' mentality between races and contributed to a broader societal turn back towards an 'I' (individualistic) focus.

?
What is 'heart work' and how can individuals engage in it today?

'Heart work' involves moral indignation directed inward, asking how one has been complicit in societal problems rather than blaming others. Practically, it means reflecting a 'we-focused' ethos in daily life, such as intentionally building relationships and engaging in neighborliness conversations across lines of difference.

?
How can individuals contribute to a new 'upswing' today?

Individuals can contribute by engaging in bottom-up, grassroots efforts to solve local problems in their communities, intentionally crossing lines of difference. It also involves listening to and empowering young people, who were key leaders in the last upswing, and fostering a 'we-focused' spirituality.

1. Prioritize Moral and Cultural Shifts

Focus on fostering a cultural or moral shift in how people perceive their obligations to one another, as historical data suggests this is a leading indicator for positive societal change, preceding economic improvements.

2. Cultivate Mutual Obligations

Shift from self-interest to a mindset of mutual obligation, focusing on caring for those left behind, as this moral reawakening historically spread beyond religious communities to foster broader societal change.

3. Practice Inward Moral Indignation

Instead of blaming others, direct moral indignation inward by reflecting on your own complicity and obligations to others, as this self-reflection characterized past progressive reformers.

4. Ensure Full Inclusivity in Progress

When working towards societal progress, ensure that the ‘we’ you are building is fully inclusive of all groups, especially people of color, and do not postpone addressing issues of racial reconciliation, as historical omissions led to the demise of previous upswings.

5. Adopt ‘Self-Interest Rightly Understood’

Shift your mindset to believe that society is not a zero-sum game, but rather that everyone benefits when collective well-being is prioritized, understanding that long-term self-interest aligns with what is good for all.

6. Invest in Collective Good

Actively invest in initiatives and behaviors that benefit the collective good, recognizing that this approach ultimately creates a better society for everyone, including yourself.

7. Initiate Change Locally (Bottom-Up)

Start making a difference at your own front doorstep, neighborhood, city, or state level, recognizing that significant societal change historically originates from bottom-up, grassroots movements.

8. Create New Associations for Connection

Actively invent and participate in new ways of bringing people together, forming associations to combat hyper-individualism and loneliness, and to build social capital.

9. Build Face-to-Face Ties Across Differences

Engage in community building by creating face-to-face relationships, especially with people from different backgrounds, to build social capital and foster citizen-driven change.

10. Practice Neighborliness Across Differences

Intentionally get to know people with differing views as individuals and neighbors, engaging in ’neighborliness conversations’ rather than political debates, to build understanding and restore a fundamental democratic act.

11. Engage in Service Projects

Join or create organizations that move beyond mere social gatherings to actively engage in service projects that address societal needs, reflecting a ‘service above self’ motto.

12. Experiment with Local Solutions

Embrace an experimental mindset by trying numerous different ideas to solve local problems, understanding that many will prove effective and contribute to broader progress.

13. Empower Young Leaders

For those who are older, actively listen to young people and empower them to take on leadership roles, as historical upswings were often driven by the initiatives of younger generations.

14. Re-center on Deep Values

In times of overwhelm and societal noise, re-center yourself on deeper, shared values that transcend divisive political moralities, connecting with a ‘morality of mutual obligation’ that resonates across different spiritualities.

15. Cultivate We-Focused Spirituality

If engaging in spirituality, consciously choose a ‘we-focused’ approach that prioritizes connections with other people and community, rather than a purely self-focused spirituality.

16. Contribute to Societal Problems for Happiness

Actively contribute to solving societal problems like inequality and polarization, as the very work of contributing is likely to increase your personal happiness.

17. Try New Meditation App

Download and sign up for the new 10% with Dan Harris app, using the 14-day trial, to access guided meditations, live community sessions, and ad-free podcasts.

This call is not just for a morality that is about getting into heaven. It's a morality that is about shaping society through the mechanisms of democracy.

Shaylyn Romney Garrett

The problem is actually that we are refusing to talk to one another. And beginning there, I think, is an incredibly important starting point.

Shaylyn Romney Garrett

The political leaders of the country were a lagging indicator. The progressive era did not come from some national charismatic leader saying, I know the way, follow me, I can fix this. It was exactly the opposite.

Robert Putnam

Whatever we we would hope to build and reorient ourselves toward today to sort of emulate this upswing that happened once before, that we absolutely has to be fully inclusive.

Shaylyn Romney Garrett

America had signed a promissory note in 1965, and we said, we're going to fix things, and we did nothing.

Robert Putnam

Engaging Across Differences at a Local Level

Shaylyn Romney Garrett
  1. Identify a person in your community with whom you have significant differences in views (e.g., political).
  2. Resist the common urge to dismiss them outright or label them as 'the problem.'
  3. Choose to take a different path by seeking to get to know them as a person and a neighbor.
  4. Engage in 'neighborliness conversations' focused on shared human experience rather than political debates.
  5. Build a relationship through mutual interaction and support, recognizing their humanity despite differing worldviews.
125 years
Period covered by the I-We-I curve Refers to the last 125 years of American society, starting from the late 1800s.
60 to 70 years
Duration of the 'upswing' period The period from the late 19th century when America moved towards greater equality and connection.
50 years
Duration of the 'downswing' period The period from the mid-1960s to the present, where trends reversed towards polarization and inequality.
30 or younger
Age of most progressive reformers The vast majority of capital-P progressives who rose to prominence as reformers were young.
Most of American growth
Lasting impact of high school education on American growth Economic historians attribute most of American growth throughout the entire 20th century to high school education.