Is It Possible You Are Irrational About COVID? | David Leonhardt

Mar 7, 2022 Episode Page ↗
Overview

David Leonhardt, a senior writer for The New York Times, discusses the complex psychology of COVID-19, arguing for a balanced approach to public health that considers both the virus's risks and the societal costs of restrictions. He urges listeners to examine political biases in risk assessment and emphasizes the need for a holistic view of well-being.

At a Glance
17 Insights
55m 25s Duration
15 Topics
4 Concepts

Deep Dive Analysis

Initial Denial and Pandemic's Psychological Impact

Current State of the Pandemic and Future Outlook

COVID's Risks Compared to the Flu for Different Groups

Navigating Risk for Vaccinated and Vulnerable Family Members

Frustration with the Unvaccinated and Herd Immunity

Addressing Vaccine Skepticism and the 'Driving Drunk' Analogy

Political Sorting of COVID Attitudes: The 'Two COVID Americas'

Irrationality on Both Sides of the Political Spectrum

Responding to Critics on Emphasizing Normalcy and Lifting Restrictions

Balancing Public Health Decisions and Societal Costs

Strategies for Convincing the Unvaccinated

Addressing Tribalism and Irrationality in Public Discourse

Relating to Personal Biases and Admitting Mistakes

COVID's Impact on Social Cohesion and Aggressive Behavior

Finding Optimism in History and Human Decency

Two COVID Americas

This concept describes how attitudes and fears about COVID-19 have sorted along partisan lines in the U.S., leading to different perceptions of risk and responses to the pandemic. It highlights how younger vaccinated Democrats can be more anxious about personal risk than older unvaccinated Republicans.

Liberal Vaccine Skepticism

This refers to a paradoxical phenomenon where vaccinated liberals, despite eagerly receiving vaccines, remain highly fearful of COVID, sometimes exaggerating personal risks and understating the costs of isolation and disruption. This form of irrationality, while different from traditional vaccine skepticism, also leads to damaging decisions.

Solving for Total Public Health

This framework suggests that public health decisions during the pandemic should balance COVID-19 risks with the broader costs of restrictions on mental health, education, crime, and economic well-being. It contrasts with 'solving for COVID,' which focuses solely on minimizing COVID cases and deaths, potentially overlooking other societal harms.

Costs of Isolation and Disruption

These are the negative societal impacts resulting from pandemic restrictions and changes in human interaction. They include surges in violent crime, vehicle crashes, drug overdoses, mental health problems (especially among adolescent girls), learning loss, and increased blood pressure, often disproportionately affecting vulnerable populations.

?
What is the current state of the COVID-19 pandemic as of early 2022?

As of early 2022, the U.S. is emerging from the Omicron wave, characterized by a highly contagious but milder variant, leading to a huge number of cases but disproportionate severe illness among the unvaccinated. Cases, hospitalizations, and deaths are receding, with no new worrisome variants on the immediate horizon, suggesting a period resembling early summer 2021.

?
Will COVID-19 ever completely disappear, allowing a full return to 2019 normalcy?

COVID-19 is unlikely to disappear entirely, as achieving herd immunity was always challenging due to factors like vaccine skepticism, the slow rollout of billions of doses, and the delayed vaccination of children. However, it is possible to return to a state resembling 2019 normalcy even with the virus circulating, if society chooses to adapt.

?
How does COVID-19's deadliness compare to the flu for different populations?

COVID-19 appears to be milder than the flu for children. For most vaccinated people, including many vulnerable individuals, the risks presented by COVID-19 are in the same ballpark as the flu. However, for unvaccinated people, especially those over 40 or 60, COVID-19 presents a risk of severe illness unlike almost anything else.

?
Is it fair for vaccinated people to be angry or frustrated with the unvaccinated?

Yes, it is fair to be frustrated with the unvaccinated because they are more likely to contract and transmit COVID-19, potentially endangering vulnerable vaccinated individuals (like elderly parents) and causing severe harm to other unvaccinated people.

?
Why have attitudes towards the pandemic and vaccines become so politically polarized in the U.S.?

Polarization began with a Republican president making false claims about COVID-19, leading conservatives to minimize the virus as part of their identity and liberals to take it seriously. This continued with vaccines, where Democrats eagerly vaccinated, while Republicans showed more skepticism, creating a significant partisan gap in vaccination rates.

?
What are the 'costs of pandemic restrictions' that are often overlooked?

Pandemic restrictions and the resulting isolation and disruption have led to significant societal costs, including surges in violent crime, vehicle crashes, drug overdoses, mental health problems (especially among adolescent girls), learning loss in schools (disproportionately affecting lower-income and minority children), and increased blood pressure.

?
How can individuals address their own biases and potential for irrationality regarding complex issues like the pandemic?

Individuals can engage in exercises like identifying their most counter-spectrum view, reflecting on past instances where they changed their mind, and critically examining their own past mistakes or analytical errors. This self-reflection, though uncomfortable, can lead to fewer future errors and a healthier perspective.

?
How has the pandemic impacted social cohesion and led to increased aggressive behavior?

The pandemic has deprived people of human interaction and social connection, leading to widespread frustration and a breakdown in empathy. This lack of daily humanizing interactions has contributed to an increase in antisocial and aggressive behaviors, such as reckless driving and hostile communication, as people are less likely to view others as human beings.

1. Self-Examine Personal Biases

Actively challenge your own political alignment by identifying a view that runs counter to your usual spectrum, and reflect on past instances where you changed your mind on a political issue to understand your own evolution and biases.

2. Acknowledge Analytical Errors

Regularly review and acknowledge your own analytical errors or predictions that proved wrong, as this practice promotes humility, learning, and better judgment, even if it feels uncomfortable.

3. Maintain Respectful Discourse

When engaging in public or personal debates, avoid disqualifying those you disagree with or accusing them of being bad people, and instead assume good intent to foster more constructive conversations.

4. Prioritize Existential Issues

Limit the number of issues you deem existential threats to the future, allowing for compromise and disagreement on other important topics, which is crucial for a functioning democracy.

5. Adopt Holistic Public Health

When making public health decisions, aim to solve for total public health rather than focusing solely on COVID, ensuring that the significant costs of isolation and disruption are also considered.

6. Re-Evaluate Child vs. Unvaccinated

Question the societal trade-off of potentially damaging children (e.g., through school closures) to protect unvaccinated adults, and consider if this prioritization is the right decision.

7. Focus Protection on Vulnerable

Direct COVID protection efforts primarily towards highly vulnerable individuals (elderly, immunocompromised) and the unvaccinated, as the virus presents a much lower risk to most vaccinated people.

8. Facilitate Vaccine Access

Make vaccination as convenient as possible by offering flexible scheduling and accessible locations, and ensure medical professionals are available to answer questions, as many people are not hard ’no’ on vaccines.

9. Leverage Credible Vaccine Advocates

Identify and support vaccine messengers who have high credibility with skeptical groups, such as individuals who were previously skeptical, those who have lost relatives to COVID, or influential public figures.

10. Test Before Visiting Vulnerable

If you have access to rapid tests, take one before visiting elderly or immunocompromised individuals, especially those in assisted living facilities, to reduce their risk of exposure.

11. Adjust Vaccinated Risk Perception

For vaccinated individuals, particularly those who are boosted, adjust your personal risk perception of COVID to be in the same ballpark as the flu, rather than an existential threat.

12. Do Not Organize Life for Unvaccinated

Do not feel obligated to organize your life around protecting the health of unvaccinated individuals, as they are often not taking steps to protect you or your vulnerable family members.

13. Acknowledge Unvaccinated Frustration

It is fair to feel frustrated with unvaccinated individuals because they are more likely to contract and transmit COVID, thereby increasing risk for vulnerable people in the community.

14. Engage Vaccine Skeptics Personally

If you have unvaccinated people in your personal life, consider engaging them in conversation about the vaccine and encouraging them to speak with their doctor, as you might save their life.

15. Seek Normal Human Interaction

Actively seek and support the return to normal forms of human interaction in schools, workplaces, and social settings, as isolation and disruption have led to increased frustration and antisocial behavior.

16. Draw Optimism From History

Look to history as a source of optimism, recognizing that the country has overcome enormous problems in the past, which can provide perspective and hope for current challenges.

17. Remember Fundamental Decency

Remember that the overwhelming majority of people are fundamentally decent and enjoy social interaction, which can help foster positive relationships and reduce hostility.

If you are vaccinated or are a child, the risks that COVID presents to you look actually quite normal. A kid almost certainly will face more risk by getting in a car today than a kid will face from COVID.

David Leonhardt

I have a really hard time telling vaccinated people that they need to organize their lives to protect the health of the unvaccinated.

David Leonhardt

Younger Democrats say they are more worried about their own risk of being hospitalized than older Democrats. So what could explain that? That's certainly not a view consistent with science.

David Leonhardt

The problem with this argument that talking about a return to normal is just sunny optimism is that it completely ignores the huge costs from isolation and disruption.

David Leonhardt

We are social creatures. We are built to interact with each other. And when we don't, when people stay inside their houses, when they cover their faces, that has costs.

David Leonhardt

History is often a source for some optimism, which is when you look at some of the things that the country has grappled with in the past, when you look at the problems that we've had, it's not like things were great in the past.

David Leonhardt

Visiting Vulnerable Individuals

David Leonhardt
  1. Take rapid tests before visiting someone in an assisted living facility or someone in their 80s or 90s.

Persuading Unvaccinated Individuals

David Leonhardt
  1. Make vaccines super convenient (e.g., available on Saturday mornings, long weekends, or during off-shifts).
  2. Put pressure on employers to give people paid time off for vaccination and recovery.
  3. Ensure nurses and doctors are available to answer people's questions about vaccines.
75%
Percentage of vaccinated deaths among people with risk factors This percentage of vaccinated deaths occurred among people who had at least four risk factors, according to Rochelle Walensky, director of the CDC.
5%
Estimated percentage of Americans who are immunocompromised This is a broad estimate, and not all immunocompromised people are specifically vulnerable to COVID.
90+ percent
Percentage of eligible Democrats vaccinated Likely 93% of eligible Democrats are vaccinated.
One in four
Kids missing at least a week of school in January due to Omicron A recent poll found this percentage of kids missed at least a week of school in January.