Are we all the heroes of our own stories? (with Cate Hall)

Jul 13, 2022 Episode Page ↗
Overview

In this episode, Spencer Greenberg speaks with Kate Hall about human nature, political polarization, mania, and psychosis. They discuss how personal narratives shape beliefs, strategies for productive dialogue, and Kate's journey through addiction and a transformative manic episode.

At a Glance
13 Insights
1h 31m Duration
11 Topics
5 Concepts

Deep Dive Analysis

The 'Hero of Your Own Story' Theory of Beliefs

Anchor Beliefs and Identity Formation

Polarization and Distrust in Institutions

COVID-19 Origins: Lab Leak Theory and Institutional Credibility

The Rationalist Community's Neglect of Politics

Challenges of Free Speech and Misinformation

Ethical Persuasion in a Weaponized Information Landscape

Cate Hall's Experience with Mania and Psychosis

The Role of Drugs in Spiritual and Psychotic Experiences

Navigating Addiction and Seeking Recovery

Post-Recovery Perspective: Optimism and Useful Narratives

Hero of Your Own Story Theory

This theory posits that people adopt beliefs that allow them to see themselves as the protagonist in an important narrative. This self-identity dictates group affiliations, which in turn shapes their beliefs about the world and the version of facts they accept, rather than facts dictating beliefs.

Anchor Beliefs

These are beliefs that an individual is unwilling to abandon, or where the implicit cost of not believing them is too high. When confronted with contradictory evidence, individuals with anchor beliefs will warp or reinterpret that evidence to maintain the core belief, creating ripples in their overall belief system.

Psychological Immune System

This concept describes how derisive, mocking, or shaming interactions, especially in political discourse, can activate a defensive psychological response. This activation makes it nearly impossible for individuals to engage in productive conversations or come to a better understanding of opposing viewpoints.

Pascal's Mugging Dilemma (in mental health)

This describes a situation where an individual, despite acknowledging the high probability of a mundane explanation (e.g., mental illness), feels compelled to act on a tiny, remote possibility of an extremely high payoff (e.g., having tapped into a fundamental, important truth). The potential infinite reward outweighs the low probability in expected value calculations, leading to paralysis or obsessive behavior.

De-emphasizing Truth for Usefulness

This is a shift in perspective where one prioritizes belief systems that are conducive to personal goals like happiness, freedom, and kindness, rather than solely focusing on whether those beliefs are objectively true. It acknowledges that certain narratives, even if fantastical, can be profoundly motivating and welfare-improving for individuals.

?
Why do people adopt false beliefs or conspiracy theories?

People often adopt beliefs that allow them to be the 'hero of their own story,' meaning they seek narratives that make them feel important and justified. This identity-driven belief formation can lead to accepting 'facts' that support their chosen narrative, even if objectively false.

?
How can one have more productive conversations with people who hold vastly different or seemingly irrational beliefs?

Productive conversations require adopting the other person's internal narrative and worldview, rather than imposing one's own. This involves listening to their sources of evidence and treating the interaction as a conversation, not a lecture, to avoid activating their psychological immune system.

?
Why has public trust in institutions, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, eroded?

Public trust has eroded due to instances where officials offered narratives they knew were false or lacked sufficient evidence for, justifying it by desired public health outcomes. This short-sighted manipulation, such as downplaying mask efficacy or misrepresenting herd immunity, has done lasting damage to credibility.

?
What is the EA/Rationalist community's blind spot regarding politics?

The EA/Rationalist community often dismisses politics as 'icky' or non-rationalist, focusing on facts dictating beliefs. This leads to a lack of understanding of the emotional and narrative-driven aspects of political behavior and a neglect of addressing the mechanisms of polarization, especially with emerging manipulative technologies.

?
What are the challenges of free speech and censorship in the age of the internet?

The internet allows fringe theories to flourish and misinformation to spread, challenging the 'sunlight is the best disinfectant' approach. Relying on authorities to moderate truth can backfire, leading to de-platforming for potentially true theories and pushing people into echo chambers, making it difficult to find a principled answer to free speech limits.

?
What does it feel like to experience mania that leads to psychosis?

Mania can feel like incredible intellectual fertility, intense curiosity, and a sense that everything is laden with meaning and significance. As it progresses to psychosis, one's fundamental model of the world can feel shattered, leading to a naive re-examination of reality and a questioning of all previously held truths.

?
How did Cate Hall reconcile her spiritual experiences during psychosis with her rational thinking?

Despite her critical thinking skills, Cate found herself in a 'Pascal's Mugging' dilemma. She acknowledged the high probability of mental illness but felt paralyzed by the tiny possibility that her experiences were a real, profoundly important spiritual truth, leading her to pursue them further.

?
How did Cate Hall's perspective on truth and narratives change after her mental health journey?

Cate's perspective shifted from emphasizing objective truth to prioritizing the usefulness of narratives. She now seeks belief systems that are conducive to her goals of being useful, happy, free, and kind, finding that these 'welfare-improving' stories are more motivating than a strict adherence to objective truth.

1. Prioritize Useful, Not Just True, Beliefs

Focus on adopting belief systems and narratives that are conducive to your goals of being useful, happy, free, and kind, rather than solely fixating on objective truth. This shift can significantly improve your quality of life and engagement with the world.

2. Engage from Others’ Hero Perspective

When aiming to change someone’s mind or have productive conversations, operate as though they believe they are the hero of their own story. Offer alternative narratives that align with their self-perception and values, rather than mocking or shaming them, which activates psychological defenses.

3. Persuade Ethically and Truthfully

When attempting to persuade, ensure your message is genuinely in the interest of the people you’re persuading, avoid self-delusion about your motives, and always use the truth without lying. This approach builds trust and is more effective long-term than manipulative tactics.

4. Support Friends Without Judgment

If a friend is experiencing a mental health crisis or holding beliefs you disagree with, provide non-judgmental support. Avoid strongly rejecting their interpretation of events; instead, take their perspective seriously and work within their framework to guide them to a healthier place.

5. Consider Inpatient Addiction Treatment

If struggling with addiction and finding it difficult to get sober independently, consider an inpatient facility. Being cut off from access provides crucial space to break the cycle, understand oneself better, and develop alternative sources of meaning.

6. Avoid Egoism in Spiritual Growth

While spiritual experiences can be profound, recognize that they are not necessarily unique or indicative of being ‘special.’ Egoism or the belief in one’s specialness can be dangerous and detrimental to one’s worldview.

7. Restore Institutional Credibility

To combat the spread of false narratives and reduce polarization, institutions of power must become more credible and trustworthy by being honest and getting the right answers more often. Lying, even with good intentions, erodes public faith and backfires in the long term.

8. Study Polarization Mechanisms

Devote more resources to understanding the psychological factors and mechanisms that drive political polarization and belief in conspiracy theories. This deeper understanding is crucial for developing effective solutions, especially with emerging manipulative technologies.

9. Test Policies with Outgroup in Power

When considering policies like platform moderation or government power, perform a thought experiment: would you feel the same way if your political outgroup were in power? This helps ensure principles are universally applicable and not just convenient for your current group.

10. Set Universal Content Moderation Rules

For content moderation on platforms, establish a limited set of rules for unacceptable speech (e.g., calling for violence) that are agreed upon by most political tribes. Beyond these, allow broad leeway for expression due to the unreliability of authorities in moderating truth.

11. Limit Excessive Sugar Consumption

Avoid consuming a large amount of sugar, as evidence suggests it is not a good idea for health. While a small amount may be fine, excessive intake is linked to negative health outcomes.

12. Maintain a Healthy Weight Range

Strive to stay within a healthy weight range to avoid extreme obesity, which is strongly linked to increased sickness. A healthy body type can encompass a broader range than societal norms suggest.

13. Find a Sustainable Diet

Focus on finding a diet and nutrition plan that is sustainable for you in the long term, allowing you to consistently stay within a healthy range without excessive sugar or weight gain. Experiment to see what works best for your body and feelings.

I think that people will adopt whatever beliefs allow them to be the hero of their own story.

Cate Hall

I think in order to be successful at changing somebody's mind, you have to offer them an alternative narrative where they see how your beliefs about the world and your understanding of facts about the world are actually in line with their story about themselves.

Cate Hall

I think that certain decisions by public health officials during the pandemic have done a tremendous amount to erode people's faith in institutions as sources of truth.

Cate Hall

I just think it's such a toxic attitude for people in power to have. And it clearly just isn't working. It's completely backfiring.

Spencer Greenberg

Mania feels like this incredible intellectual fertility, where your priors become much lower, there's a lot more up for consideration, you become curious about the world in an intense way that I'd never experienced before. And everything feels laden with meaning and significance and beauty.

Cate Hall

I guess the one thing that I would say is my overall takeaway from the last four years or so has been a changed relationship to narratives and telling stories about myself compared to what I used to have. And one that sort of de-emphasizes truth, as weird as that might sound, and emphasizes instead usefulness and the kinds of beliefs that are conducive to the goals that I have for myself and my relationship with the world.

Cate Hall
20%
Spencer Greenberg's initial estimated probability of COVID lab leak Early in the pandemic.
50-50
Spencer Greenberg's current estimated probability of COVID lab leak Based on newer information, but not all the newest.
North of 75%
Cate Hall's estimated probability of COVID originating from human intervention (lab escape or sampling efforts) Combines direct lab escape and EcoHealth Alliance sampling efforts.
1-2 months
Duration Cate Hall was consistently psychotic Even when not actively using drugs.
Just over a year
Duration Cate Hall has been clean from drugs Longest period of sobriety.