Explanatory Depth and Growth Mindset (with Daniel Greene)

May 26, 2021 Episode Page ↗
Overview

In this episode, Spencer Greenberg speaks with Dan Green about the illusion of explanatory depth, mental models of belief, expertise, and growth mindset. They explore how articulating beliefs can moderate extreme views and discuss the ethical application of social science.

At a Glance
14 Insights
1h 18m Duration
12 Topics
8 Concepts

Deep Dive Analysis

Introduction to the Illusion of Explanatory Depth

Impact of Explanatory Depth on Attitudes and Partisanship

Rethinking Debates and Structured Discussion for Agreement

The Concept of Epistemic Debt and Unexamined Beliefs

Identifying and Trusting Experts in Complex Domains

The Role of Skepticism and Seekingness in Truth-Seeking

Personality Traits and Their Value in Groups

Understanding and Applying the Growth Mindset Concept

Challenges and Nuances in Growth Mindset Research

Lessons from the Power Posing Debate and Replication

Ethical Considerations for Applying Social Science

Positive Potential of Social Science for Global Challenges

Illusion of Explanatory Depth

People often overestimate their understanding of how things work, and attempting to explain something reveals their actual lack of detailed knowledge, often leading to reduced confidence and more moderate views on policy issues.

Epistemic Debt

This metaphor describes the accumulation of 'IOUs' in one's mind, where a person holds opinions or beliefs without having a deep, fleshed-out understanding of their foundations. It represents a debt of knowledge or an unawareness of one's own ignorance.

Skepticism (as a trait)

A personality trait characterized by carefully vetting new ideas before accepting them into one's worldview, maintaining a high bar of scrutiny even for trusted sources.

Seekingness (as a trait)

A personality trait characterized by actively seeking out and exploring ideas that differ from one's current beliefs, often by engaging with diverse sources and perspectives.

Big Five Personality Factors

A well-researched personality model identifying five basic factors: agreeableness, openness, conscientiousness, extroversion, and emotional stability (sometimes called neuroticism), which describe stable individual differences.

Growth Mindset

A belief that one's intelligence or ability in a specific domain, or in general, is malleable and can be improved through effort, learning, and the application of effective strategies, rather than being a fixed trait.

Fixed Mindset

The opposite of a growth mindset, this is the belief that one's intelligence or ability is an inherent, unchangeable trait, leading individuals to interpret challenges as threats to their perceived ability rather than opportunities for growth.

Growth Mindset of Interest

The idea that interest in a new field or hobby grows over time as one gets better at it and learns more, rather than being an immediate passion that is discovered fully formed.

?
What is the illusion of explanatory depth?

It's the phenomenon where people believe they understand something better than they actually do, only realizing their lack of knowledge when prompted to explain it causally.

?
How can realizing the illusion of explanatory depth impact people's views?

It can lead people to become less confident in their understanding and moderate the extremity of their attitudes on policy issues.

?
How can discussions be structured to promote understanding rather than just persuasion?

One method involves participants explaining their views to each other until the other person can state it back to their satisfaction, then collaboratively identifying the source of their disagreement.

?
What is 'epistemic debt'?

It's a concept describing the accumulation of unexamined or shallowly understood beliefs and opinions, where one holds a position without having deeply explored its foundational elements.

?
What are some signs of a trustworthy expert?

Trustworthy experts often appear emotionally calm and dispassionate about a topic, can fairly represent opposing viewpoints, and demonstrate 'skin in the game' by having something to lose if they are wrong.

?
How do the personality traits of skepticism and seekingness contribute to truth-seeking?

Skepticism involves carefully vetting new ideas, while seekingness involves actively looking for diverse perspectives; together, they help individuals avoid blindly adopting bad ideas or becoming stuck in a rigid worldview.

?
What is a 'growth mindset'?

A growth mindset is the belief that one's intelligence and abilities can be developed and improved through effort and effective strategies, rather than being fixed traits.

?
How does a growth mindset influence how people respond to challenges?

Individuals with a growth mindset tend to interpret difficulties as opportunities to learn, try harder, or employ different strategies, rather than as a sign of inherent lack of ability.

?
Why is it difficult to definitively say whether 'growth mindset works'?

The effectiveness of growth mindset is complex, depending on whether one is asking if the underlying idea is true, if survey measures predict outcomes, or if specific interventions yield results, with effects varying greatly across individuals and contexts.

?
How can social science be used ethically to do good in the world?

Social science is ethical when it helps people achieve their own goals, provided those goals are not harmful to others, rather than manipulating them to achieve the goals of the social scientist or an external entity.

1. Cultivate Skepticism & Seekingness

To improve your truth-seeking ability, actively seek out diverse ideas (seekingness) while carefully vetting new information before accepting it (skepticism). This prevents uncritically adopting bad ideas or becoming stuck in your current worldview.

2. Adopt a Growth Mindset

Believe that your intelligence and abilities are malleable and can improve with effort and strategy. Interpret difficulties and feedback as opportunities to learn and adapt, rather than as indicators of fixed ability.

3. Articulate Beliefs to Uncover Ignorance

To improve your thinking and understand your true knowledge, try to explain how something works in causal steps. This process often reveals gaps in your understanding and can reduce overconfidence.

4. Write Out Your Beliefs

Regularly write down your beliefs, attitudes, and positions on various topics. This practice helps you discover your own ignorance and decide where to deepen your understanding or moderate your opinions.

5. Engage in Collaborative Discussions

For productive discussions on controversial topics, use a structured, one-on-one format without an audience. Each person explains their view until the other can restate it to their satisfaction, then they collaboratively identify the source of disagreement.

6. Embrace Learning from Mistakes

Cultivate a mindset that welcomes mistakes and opportunities to learn, rather than becoming defensive when flaws in reasoning are pointed out. This fosters a more productive and open learning environment.

7. Develop Growth Mindset of Interest

Understand that interest in new fields or hobbies often grows over time as you develop skills and knowledge, rather than being an immediate passion. This perspective can help you persist through initial challenges and avoid giving up prematurely.

8. Moderate Extreme Views

To reduce partisanship and moderate extreme attitudes, explain an issue in causal terms. This process can decrease overconfidence in your understanding and make your positions less extreme.

9. Evaluate Experts Critically

When seeking expert opinions, prioritize individuals who are emotionally calm, can dispassionately explain opposing views, have “skin in the game” (lose something if wrong), and are willing to update their opinions with new information.

10. Value Disagreeable Individuals

Recognize the important role of disagreeable individuals in intellectual discussions, as they are often willing to directly challenge bad ideas and prevent groupthink, even if their approach is not always gentle.

11. Apply Ethical Social Influence

When using social science or any influence, ensure your actions help individuals achieve their own goals, and that those goals are not harmful to others. This principle guides ethical intervention.

12. Acknowledge Intervention Variability

Understand that interventions (like growth mindset programs) have highly variable effects across individuals; some may be life-changing for a few, while others are unaffected. This suggests implementing a range of low-cost interventions and looking for outlier wins.

13. Consider Power Posing

If you are highly reactive to body posture, try adopting powerful stances (e.g., hands on hips, standing tall) before stressful situations. This can lead to self-reported increases in feelings of power, confidence, and improved mood.

14. Articulate Intuitive Knowledge

Recognize that intuitive knowledge, gained from experience, is often hard to articulate. Actively try to put this “deeper in your bones” understanding into words or communication to discover and refine its underlying reasons.

You sometimes think that you understand something better than you actually do. And when you are prompted to try to explain it, you realize how little that you know.

Dan Green

It's so funny and refreshing to be in a conversation with someone who has a mindset of being excited about mistakes or opportunities to learn.

Spencer Greenberg

The thing that they'll say to you is very often just the first thought that comes to them about why that might be a good idea. It is not necessarily their best argument for why it's a good idea...

Spencer Greenberg

If it's constantly shifting wildly to the left and the right, you might not have confidence that it's going to hit the target. And if it's never shifting, if it's just going in a straight line, you might be worried that it's not adjusting and updating with new information or new facts.

Dan Green

Everyone has the possibility to significantly improve. And if they're aware of that, that should help them improve. It's a pretty intuitively plausible idea worthy of investigation. Not anyone can do anything at any time.

Dan Green

Structured Discussion for Disagreement

Spencer Greenberg
  1. Person A explains their viewpoint to Person B until Person B can state it back to Person A's satisfaction.
  2. Person B explains their viewpoint to Person A until Person A can state it back to Person B's satisfaction.
  3. Both collaboratively work together to identify the underlying source of their disagreement.
2013
Year of Fernbach and colleagues' study on illusion of explanatory depth and policy positions Study showed reduced confidence and moderated attitudes.
1970s
Approximate decade when the Big Five personality model existed since A well-researched personality model.
5
Number of basic personality factors in the Big Five model Agreeableness, openness, conscientiousness, extroversion, and emotional stability.
78th percentile
Spencer Greenberg's agreeableness percentile An example of an individual personality trait.
1980s
Approximate decade when the first ideas of growth mindset were articulated Foundational work by Carol Dweck.