THINKERS Workshop (with Spencer Greenberg)

Oct 13, 2020 Episode Page ↗
Overview

Spencer Greenberg, PhD in applied math and founder of Clearer Thinking, discusses cognitive biases, the importance of nuanced thinking (probabilistic, gray, multi-factor), and the distinction between soldier and scout mindsets. He also shares his FIRE framework for choosing between reflective and intuitive decision-making.

At a Glance
16 Insights
58m 3s Duration
15 Topics
10 Concepts

Deep Dive Analysis

Introduction to Cognitive Biases: Definition and Evolution

Common Cognitive Biases and Strategies for Overcoming Them

Overlooked Biases: Value Traps and Moral Nearsightedness

Motivation for Studying Clear Thinking and Its Challenges

Nuanced Thinking: Overcoming the Truth Binary with Probabilistic Thinking

Nuanced Thinking: Overcoming the Goodness Binary with Gray Thinking

Soldier Mindset vs. Scout Mindset in Disagreements

Nuanced Thinking: Overcoming the Identification Binary with Multi-Factor Thinking

Reflective vs. Intuitive Decision Making: The FIRE Framework

Teaching Kids to Think Better

Balancing Confidence with Self-Skepticism

Foundational Thinking Models and Logical Fallacies

The Power of Writing for Clearer Thinking

Habits for Better Decision-Making

Book Recommendations for Improving Thinking

Cognitive Bias

A systematic pattern of human behavior that leads to inaccurate conclusions or decisions that go against one's goals or values. These biases often stem from mental shortcuts developed for ancient challenges, which can be unhelpful in the modern world.

Sunk Cost Fallacy

The tendency to continue investing time or resources into a project or endeavor, even when its future prospects are poor, because of the past investment already made. This ignores the fact that past expenditures are lost regardless of future action.

Anchoring

A cognitive bias where an initial piece of information, even if irrelevant, influences subsequent judgments and decisions. This can be seen in negotiations where the first number mentioned can heavily sway the final outcome.

Value Traps

A problem arising from confusing instrumental values (things valued for what they get us, like money) with intrinsic values (things valued for their own sake, like happiness or autonomy). This can lead to endlessly pursuing instrumental values beyond their utility, causing misery.

Moral Nearsightedness

The phenomenon where individuals passionately holding a moral belief struggle to conceive of someone who disagrees with them as anything other than a 'bad person.' This prevents understanding opposing viewpoints.

Probabilistic Thinking

The antidote to the 'truth binary,' involving the recognition that all beliefs should carry some degree of uncertainty. Instead of 'true or false,' one assigns probabilities (e.g., 'I'm 90% sure'), which makes one a more accurate thinker and open to new evidence.

Gray Thinking

The antidote to the 'goodness binary,' which acknowledges that almost everything in the world is a mix of good and bad. To fully understand a concept or situation, one must be able to see both its positive and negative aspects, rather than categorizing it as strictly one or the other.

Multi-Factor Thinking

The antidote to the 'identification binary,' which moves beyond binary classifications (e.g., 'it is a thing' or 'it is not a thing'). Instead, it involves considering multiple factors or a spectrum of properties to describe something, recognizing that things can be 'kind of' or 'in some ways' rather than absolute categories.

Soldier Mindset

A mode of thinking where the primary goal is to win an argument or defeat an ideological opponent, rather than to genuinely seek the truth. This mindset prioritizes defending one's existing beliefs over open inquiry.

Scout Mindset

A mode of thinking focused on accurately understanding reality and seeking the truth, even if it means updating or changing one's own beliefs. This mindset is open to evidence and perspectives that contradict one's initial position.

?
What are cognitive biases and why do they exist?

Cognitive biases are systematic patterns of human behavior that lead to inaccurate conclusions or decisions against one's goals. They exist because our brains evolved to solve challenges faced by our ancient ancestors, which are very different from modern-world problems.

?
How can we overcome cognitive biases?

Overcoming biases involves three steps: identifying the bias pattern in the real world, knowing a specific strategy to combat it, and being motivated enough to actually use that strategy despite emotional resistance.

?
Why is nuanced thinking important, and what are its different forms?

Nuanced thinking is crucial because the world is complicated, and oversimplified binary thinking (true/false, good/bad, is/is not) leads to inaccurate conclusions and poor decisions. Its forms include probabilistic thinking (for truth), gray thinking (for goodness), and multi-factor thinking (for identification).

?
How can one practice probabilistic thinking effectively?

It's best to assign numerical probabilities (e.g., 60%, 70%) to beliefs rather than vague words like 'pretty sure,' as numbers are more precise. Tools like games that provide immediate feedback on probability assignments can help calibrate one's accuracy.

?
Why should people bother with nuanced thinking if binary thinking feels simpler?

Nuanced thinking is essential for important decisions (personal or societal) where accuracy truly matters. Practicing it on smaller issues builds the skill needed for critical moments, and it helps avoid causing harm due to oversimplified views, even with good intentions.

?
How can you have productive disagreements with others?

Productive disagreements require both parties to be in a 'scout mindset' (seeking truth, not just winning). If the other person is in a 'soldier mindset,' the first step is to help them feel unattacked and understand their perspective, then chart a path from their beliefs to yours.

?
When should we trust our gut (intuitive decision-making) versus engaging in reflective decision-making?

Intuitive decision-making is best for 'FIRE' decisions: Fast, Irrelevant, Repetitious (with feedback), or Evolutionary. For all other decisions, reflective thinking, which involves more time, multiple considerations, and working memory, is generally more appropriate.

?
What should parents teach their children to help them become better thinkers?

Parents should gently point out flaws in their children's arguments, even if the conclusion is correct, to foster good argumentation. They should also expose children to diverse perspectives early on, teaching them that every group makes mistakes and avoiding a 'bubble' mentality.

?
How can one balance the need for confidence in success with the avoidance of self-delusion?

Instead of being overly confident in specific beliefs or immediate outcomes, cultivate confidence in the process of continuous adaptation, learning, and growth over time. This process-oriented confidence increases the likelihood of eventual success, even if the initial path changes.

?
What is the role of writing in improving one's thinking abilities?

Writing significantly expands one's working memory, allowing for the processing and organization of complex thoughts that would be difficult to hold in mind simultaneously. It serves as a powerful tool for clarifying one's own thoughts and understanding topics more deeply.

?
What daily habits can help people build better decision-making skills?

A key habit is to actively generate more options early in any important decision-making process. People often get anchored on only a few choices, but forcing oneself to brainstorm additional alternatives can lead to discovering superior, previously unconsidered solutions.

1. Adopt Scout Mindset

When engaging in disagreement, ensure you are in a ‘scout mindset’ (seeking truth and open to changing your mind) before trying to convince others. If they are in a ‘soldier mindset’ (trying to win), first aim to shift them to a scout mindset to enable productive dialogue.

2. Cultivate Probabilistic Thinking

Recognize that you should be at least a little uncertain about all your beliefs, shifting from binary ’true/false’ statements to assigning probabilities (e.g., ‘I’m 90% sure’). This allows for a more accurate self-model and openness to counter-evidence.

3. Practice Gray Thinking

Avoid the ‘goodness binary’ by accepting that almost every good thing has some bad, and vice versa. To fully understand complex topics, strive to see both positive and negative aspects and everything in between.

4. Employ Multi-Factor Thinking

Overcome the ‘identification binary’ by analyzing things based on multiple factors rather than simple ‘is/is not’ classifications. This allows for a nuanced understanding of how something exhibits various properties on different spectrums.

5. Choose Decision-Making Mode (FIRE)

Use intuitive (gut) decision-making for ‘FIRE’ decisions: Fast, Irrelevant, Repetitious (with feedback), or Evolutionary. For all other important decisions, engage in reflective thinking, which involves multiple considerations and more time.

6. Generate More Decision Options

For important decisions, actively generate multiple options beyond the initial obvious choices, as the quality of your final outcome is limited by the range of alternatives you considered.

7. Understand Others’ Perspectives

To effectively change someone’s mind, first ensure they don’t feel attacked and genuinely understand their perspective, including their fears and reasons for belief. Then, create a clear path from their current beliefs to your own.

8. Identify Core Beliefs

When trying to change someone’s mind, focus on identifying and addressing their ’load-bearing columns’ or fundamental beliefs that support their entire belief system, as merely challenging minor points may be ineffective.

9. Correct Cognitive Biases

To reduce cognitive biases, first learn to identify the bias pattern in the real world, then know how to combat it, and finally, feel motivated enough to apply the correction strategy.

10. Memorize Biases and Fallacies

Memorize common logical fallacies and cognitive biases as a foundational step. This pattern recognition is crucial for noticing flawed thinking in yourself and others, even though memorization alone isn’t sufficient for correction.

11. Calibrate Probabilistic Beliefs

Assign specific numerical probabilities to your beliefs (e.g., 60% sure) instead of vague terms like ‘pretty sure’ to improve precision and calibration. Tools like the game on clearerthinking.org can help train this skill.

12. Re-Anchor Against Bias

When encountering anchoring (e.g., in negotiations), ignore the initial number given and instead determine your own independent valuation, then propose that number to avoid being unduly influenced.

13. Write to Clarify Thinking

Utilize writing (e.g., blogging, journaling) as a powerful tool to expand your working memory and clarify your thoughts. This process helps you figure out what you truly think about complex topics.

14. Confidence in Process

Reconcile confidence with self-delusion by having confidence in the process of continuous learning, adaptation, and trying different things over a long period, rather than being overly confident in any single belief or specific outcome.

15. Expose Kids to Diverse Views

Expose children early to diverse perspectives and the idea that no single group has all the answers. This encourages them to listen to different viewpoints beyond their immediate social bubble.

16. Teach Children Argumentation

When children make flawed arguments, gently point out the logical weaknesses and guide them to construct stronger arguments, even if their conclusion is correct, to foster good thinking habits.

I think of a cognitive bias as a systematic pattern of human behavior that either leads to inaccurate conclusions or leading you to make decisions or take actions that go against your own goals or values.

Spencer Greenberg

The most important not person not to fool is yourself. And you're the easiest person of all to fool.

Spencer Greenberg

If you would never change your mind and your current state of mind, you're not ready to try to convince the other person.

Spencer Greenberg

To actually change someone's mind, you have to, first of all, make them feel like you're not attacking them because when you're being attacked, nobody wants to change their mind when they're being attacked, right?

Spencer Greenberg

The final outcome is only as good as the best option you considered.

Spencer Greenberg

Overcoming Cognitive Biases

Spencer Greenberg
  1. Learn to identify the pattern in the real world that indicates this bias might be occurring.
  2. Know how to combat it with a specific correction strategy.
  3. Feel motivated enough to actually use the correction strategy, overcoming emotional reactions.

Engaging in Productive Disagreements (based on Julia Galef's work)

Spencer Greenberg
  1. Ensure you are in a scout mindset (willing to change your mind).
  2. Assess if the person you're talking to is in a scout mindset; if not, your first goal is to get them into one (make them feel not attacked, understand their perspective).
  3. Once both are in scout mindset, listen to each other and chart a path from their beliefs to yours, understanding their underlying reasons and fears.

FIRE Framework for Decision Making

Spencer Greenberg
  1. Use intuition for **F**ast decisions (e.g., swerving a car).
  2. Use intuition for **I**rrelevant decisions (e.g., choosing carrots for a salad).
  3. Use intuition for **R**epetitious decisions if you have lots of practice and feedback (e.g., a chess master's moves).
  4. Trust intuition for **E**volutionary decisions (e.g., avoiding rotten meat, reacting to a loud noise).
1 instance
Time for a friend to cancel dinner Example of recency bias, where this one instance might be overweighted compared to 5 previous instances where they didn't cancel.
Thousands
Number of questions in Clearer Thinking's game for assigning probabilities Allows users to train in assigning probabilities more accurately and calibrate their confidence.
About 20%
Percentage of study participants who chose a new option after being forced to generate more choices From a study using Clearer Thinking's 'Decision Advisor' tool, demonstrating the power of generating more options.