The War For Kindness

Overview

Dr. Laurie Santos, with guests Mina Cikara and Jamil Zaki, explores how intergroup biases lead to hatred and violence. They discuss the science behind empathy gaps and schadenfreude, offering strategies like deep canvassing and story-sharing to foster kindness and bridge societal divides.

At a Glance
8 Insights
35m 1s Duration
12 Topics
5 Concepts

Deep Dive Analysis

The Red Sox Hat Incident and Intergroup Bias

Personal Roots of Research: The Yugoslavian Civil War

The Intergroup Empathy Gap

Understanding Schadenfreude and Outgroup Harm

Shifting from Intergroup Conflict to Empathy

Jamil Zaki's 'War for Kindness'

Empathy as a Malleable Skill

The 'Disagreeing Better' Empathy Challenge

Deep Canvassing: A Strategy for Changing Minds

Real-World Impact of Vulnerability and Story Sharing

Overcoming Obstacles to Empathy and Collective Change

Commitment to Empathic Action and Future Topics

Intergroup Biases

This refers to the shift in perspective when interactions are viewed through the lens of 'us and them' rather than 'me and you.' Humans naturally divide the world into in-groups and out-groups, which can lead to negative emotions and behaviors towards those perceived as different.

Intergroup Empathy Gap

This is the phenomenon where failures of empathy are particularly likely when individuals belong to socially distant or different social/ethnic groups. People literally don't experience the pain of outgroup members the same way they do for those in their own group.

Schadenfreude

A German word meaning 'harm joy,' it refers to the malicious pleasure people feel when they see another person suffering. This feeling can be triggered by disliking someone, perceiving them as unjust or undeserving, or envying them, and can be easily engendered towards outgroup members.

Ventral Striatum and Schadenfreude

Research shows that watching a rival fail activates the ventral striatum, a brain region involved in reward and learning. This activation links the pleasure of schadenfreude to the possibility of one's own actions causing such a rewarding event, potentially increasing the desire to harm others.

Deep Canvassing

A longer form of political canvassing that involves sharing personal narratives relevant to an issue, prompting voters to share their own stories. This method makes discrimination more concrete, reduces fears towards outgroups, and helps connect people across seemingly unbridgeable divides.

?
Why do humans generally avoid harming others?

Decades of psychological research show that most people have strong moral prohibitions against harm, guiding their behavior. Studies indicate a physiological aversion, even to pretending to harm others, with increased heart rate and bodily arousal.

?
Do we feel the same empathy for all people?

No, evidence indicates that failures of empathy are particularly likely when targets are socially distant or belong to other social or ethnic groups. We literally don't experience the pain of outgroup members in the same way we do for people in our own group.

?
Is empathy beneficial for the person feeling it?

Yes, caring for others is one of the most important ways to care for oneself. People who experience a lot of empathy tend to be happier, less stressed, experience less depression, and find it easier to make and maintain important relationships.

?
How effective is deep canvassing at changing minds?

Deep canvassing is highly effective, yielding about five to seven new supporters for every hundred people contacted. Its persuasion effects are long-lasting, often extending for months, making it impactful for ballot measures decided by small margins.

1. Cultivate Curiosity in Disagreement

When encountering ideological differences, instead of debating or judging, actively cultivate curiosity by asking others about the origins of their opinions and sharing your own stories, as this fosters appreciation and connection across divides.

2. Initiate Connection and Vulnerability

Take the powerful first step of putting your guard down, being vulnerable, and listening to others, as this often encourages them to reciprocate, leading to mutual understanding and connection.

3. Address Individuals, Not Stereotypes

In intergroup interactions, focus on engaging with the actual person in front of you rather than relying on preconceived ideas or stereotypes, as this common mistake significantly escalates conflict.

4. Care for Others for Self-Care

Prioritize caring for others, as data indicates that empathic actions are a vital way to care for yourself, leading to increased happiness, reduced stress, and lower rates of depression.

5. Help Others When Stressed

When feeling overwhelmed or short on personal time and energy, intentionally choose to help someone else, as this counterintuitive action can lead to feeling energized rather than depleted.

6. Recognize Mental Mistakes

Actively identify and be aware of the cognitive errors your mind makes, particularly in intergroup contexts, as recognizing these mistakes is a crucial step toward finding solutions and increasing happiness.

7. Commit to Kindness

Make a conscious commitment to being kinder to others to actively combat societal divisiveness and the increasing sense of disconnection, viewing it as a deliberate ‘war for kindness’.

8. Manage Empathic Energy

Understand that it is acceptable to manage your emotional energy and bandwidth, and you are not obligated to connect with or empathize with individuals expressing hateful or awful things, especially when it is emotionally exhausting.

to be empathic, to choose empathy, is a radical choice in today's culture. It is a fight against other forces that are pushing us in the opposite direction.

Jamil Zaki

empathy is under our control more than we realize.

Jamil Zaki

by virtue of marking myself as a member of Red Sox Nation, I started to get treated that way. And once I started to receive that treatment, I started to react on behalf of Red Sox Nation.

Mina Chikara

It's exhausting to connect. And it's especially exhausting to connect with people who say things that are awful and that don't really deserve a platform. So I think it's perfectly okay for people to think about what they have the energy for, what they have the space for.

Jamil Zaki

when we take a step towards listening to others, towards being vulnerable with them, oftentimes we find that they're ready to do the same thing.

Jamil Zaki

Those participants who exhibited that much more ventral striatal activation in response to watching their rival fail were the same people who told me two weeks later that they would be that much more likely to heckle, hit, and insult a rival fan.

Mina Chikara

Disagreeing Better Empathy Challenge

Jamil Zaki
  1. Find someone with whom you have an ideological difference of opinion.
  2. Instead of yelling, judging, or debating, try to cultivate curiosity about each other.
  3. Ask this person how they came to have their opinion in the first place.
  4. Share with them the story of how you came to have your opinion in the first place.
over 200 million
Civilians perished in large-scale group violence in the last century Not soldiers, but civilians, as a result of large-scale group violence.
4 out of 5
Average American empathy score in 1979 (on a 1-5 scale) Based on a study presenting statements about tender, concerned feelings for others.
3.5 out of 5
Average American empathy score in 2009 (on a 1-5 scale) A decline from 1979, indicating less empathy over time.
75 percent
Percentage of Americans in 1979 more empathic than the average American in 2009 Highlights the significant decline in empathy over 30 years.
5 to 7
New supporters gained per 100 people through deep canvassing For controversial political issues, demonstrating the effectiveness of the method.
less than 5 percentage points
Typical margin for winning or losing ballot measures Contextualizes why deep canvassing's impact of 5-7 new supporters per 100 is significant.